29/10/16, Gush Shalom גוש שלום
http://zope.gush-shalom.org (Israel)
WHAT WILL Donald Trump do if he loses the
elections in a week and a half from now, as most polls indicate?
He has already declared that he will
recognize the results -- but only if he wins.
That sounds like a joke. But it is far from
being a joke.
No, that is not a joke. Not at all.
THIS IS not a joke, because Trump represents
tens of millions of Americans, who belong to the lower strata of the white
population, which the white elite used to call "white trash". In more
polite
language they are called "blue collar workers", meaning manual
workers, unlike the "white collar workers" who occupy the offices.
If the tens of millions of blue collar voters
refuse to recognize the election results, American democracy will be in danger.
The United States may become a banana republic, like some of its southern
neighbors, which have never enjoyed a stable democracy.
This problem exists in all modern
nation-states with a sizable national minority. The lowest strata of the ruling
people hates the minority. Members of the minority push them out of the lower
jobs. And more importantly: the lower strata of the ruling majority have
nothing to be proud of except for their belonging to the ruling people.
The German unemployed voted for Adolf Hitler,
who promoted them to the "Herrenvolk" (master people) and the Aryan
race. They gave him power, and Germany was razed to the ground.
THE ONE and only Winston Churchill famously
said that democracy is a bad system, but that all the other systems tried were
worse.
As far as democracy is concerned, the United
States was a model for the world. Already in its early days it attracted
freedom-lovers everywhere. Almost 200 years ago, the French thinker, Alexis de
Tocqueville, wrote a glowing report about the "Democratie en
Amerique".
My generation grew up in admiration of
American democracy. We saw European democracy breaking down and sinking into
the morass of fascism. We admired this young America, which saved Europe in two
world wars, out of sheer idealism. The democratic America vanquished German
Nazism and Japanese militarism, and later Soviet Bolshevism.
Our childish attitude gave way to a more
mature view. We learned about the genocide of the native Americans and about
slavery. We saw how America is seized from time to time by an attack of
craziness, such as the witch hunt of Salem and the era of Joe McCarthy, who
discovered a Communist under every bed.
But we also saw Martin Luther King, we saw
the first black President, and now we are probably about to see the first
female President. All because of this miracle: American democracy.
And here come this man, Donald Trump, and
tries to rip apart the delicate ties that bind American society together. He
incites men against women, whites against blacks and hispanics, the rich
against the destitute. He sows mutual hatred everywhere.
Perhaps the American people will get rid of
this plague and send Trump back where he came from - television. Perhaps Trump
will disappear like a bad dream, as did McCarthy and his spiritual forefathers.
Let's hope. But there is also the opposite
possibility: that Trump will cause a disaster never seen before: the downfall
of democracy, the destruction of national cohesion, the breaking up into a
thousand splinters.
CAN THIS happen in Israel? Do we have an
Israel a phenomenon that can be compared to the ascent of the American Trump?
Is there an Israeli Trump?
Indeed, there is. But the Israeli Trump is a
Trumpess.
She is called Miri Regev.
She resembles the original Trump in many
ways. She challenges the Tel Aviv "old elites" as Trump incites
against Washington. She incites Jewish citizens against Arab citizens.
Orientals of eastern descent against Ashkenazis of European descent. The
uncultured against the cultured. The poor against all others. She tears apart
the delicate ties of Israeli society.
She is not the only one of her kind, of
course. But she overshadows all the others.
After the elections for the 20th Knesset, in
March 2015, and the setting-up of the new government, Israel was overrun by a
band of far-right politicians, like a pack of hungry wolves. Men and women
without charm, without dignity, possessed by a ravenous hunger for power, for
conspicuousness at any price, people out for their own personal interest and
for nothing else. They compete with each other in the hunt for headlines and
provocative actions.
AT the starting line they were all equal -
ambitious, unlikable, uninhibited. But gradually, Miri Regev overtakes all the
others. All they can do, she can do better. For every headline grabbed by
another, she can grab five. For every condemnation of another in the media, she
gets ten.
Benyamin Netanyahu is a dwarf, but compared
to this bunch he is a giant. In order to remain so, he appointed each of them
to the job he or she is most unsuited for. Miri Regev, a rude, vulgar,
primitive person became Minister of Culture and Sports.
Regev, 51, is a good-looking woman, daughter
of immigrants from Morocco. She was born as Miri Siboni in Kiryat-Gat, a place
for which I have deep feelings, because it was there that I was wounded in
1948. Then it was still an Arab village called Irak-al-Nabshiyeh, and my life
was saved by four soldiers, one of whom was called Siboni (no connection).
For many years, Regev served in the army as a
public relations officer, rising to the rank of Colonel. Seems that one day she
decided to do public relations for herself, rather than for others.
Since her first day as Minister of Culture,
she has supplied the media with a steady stream of scandals and provocations.
Thus she gradually overtakes all her competitors in the Likud leadership. They
just cannot compete with her energy and inventiveness.
She declared proudly that she sees her job as
the elimination of all anti-Likud people from the cultural arena -- after all,
"that's what the Likud was elected for."
All over the world, governments subsidize
cultural institutions and creative people, convinced that culture is a vital
national asset. When Charles de Gaulle was the President of France, he was once
approached by his police chiefs with the request to issue an arrest warrant for
the philosopher Jean-Paul Sartre, because of his support for the Algerian
freedom fighters. De Gaulle refused and said: "Sartre too is France!".
Well, Regev is no de Gaulle. She threatens to
withdraw government subsidies from any institution that publicly opposes the
policy of the right-wing government. She demanded the cancelation of the
program of an Arab rapper who read from the works of Mahmoud Darwish, the
adored national poet of the Arab citizens and of the entire Arab world. She
demanded that all theaters and orchestras perform in the settlements in the
occupied territories, if they want to keep their subsidies.
This week she won a resounding victory when
Habima, the "national theater", agreed to perform in Kiryat-Arba, a
nest of the most fanatical fascist settlers. Indeed, no day passes without news
of some new exploit by Regev. Her colleagues explode with jealousy.
THE BASIS of Israeli Trumpism and of Miri
Regev's career is the deep resentment of the Oriental - or Mizrahi - community.
It is directed against the Ashkenazim, the Israelis of European descent. They
are accused of treating the Orientals with disdain, calling them "the
second Israel".
Since those recruits of Moroccan descent
saved my life near the birthplace of Miri Regev, I have written many words
about the tragedy of Mizrahi immigration, a tragedy of which I was an
eye-witness from the first moment. Many injustices were committed by the
established Jewish population against the new immigrants, mostly without bad
intentions. But the greatest sin of all is rarely mentioned.
Every community need a sense of pride, based
on its past achievements. The pride was taken away from the Mizrahim, who
arrived in the country after the 1948 war. They were treated as people devoid
of culture, without a past, "cave-dwellers from the Atlas mountains".
This attitude was a part of the contempt for
Arab culture, a contempt deeply embedded in the Zionist movement. Vladimir
(Ze'ev) Jabotinsky, the right-wing Zionist leader and forefather of the Likud
party, wrote in his time an article entitled "The East", in which he
expressed his disdain for Oriental culture, Jewish and Arab alike, because of
its religiosity and inability to separate between state and religion -- a
barrier to any human progress, according to him. This article is rarely
mentioned nowadays.
The Oriental immigrants came to a country
that was predominantly "secular", non-religious and Western. It was
also very anti-Arab and anti-Muslim. The new immigrants understood quickly
that, in order to be accepted in Israeli society, they must get rid of their
traditional-religious culture. They learned to distance themselves from
everything Arab, such as their accent and their songs. Otherwise it would be
difficult to become part of the country's new society.
Before the birth of Zionism - a very European
movement - there was no enmity between Jews and Muslims. Quite the contrary.
When the Jews were expeled from Catholic Spain, many centuries ago, only a
minority immigrated to anti-Semitic, Christian Europe. The vast majority went
to Muslim lands and was received with open arms all over the Ottoman Empire.
Before that, in Muslim Spain, the Jews
achieved their crowning glory, the "Golden Age". They were integrated
in all spheres of society and government and spoke Arabic. Many of their men of
letters wrote Arabic and were admired by Muslims as well as Jews. Maimonides,
perhaps the greatest of Sephardic Jews, wrote Arabic and was the personal
physician of Saladin, the Muslim warrior who vanquished the Crusaders. The
ancestors of these Crusaders had slaughtered Jew and Muslim alike when they
conquered Jerusalem. Another great Mizrahi Jew, Saadia Gaon, translated the
Torah into Arabic. And so on.
It would have been natural for Oriental Jews
to take pride in this glorious past, as German Jews take pride in Heinrich
Heine and French Jews in Marcel Proust. But the cultural climate in Israel
compelled them to give up their heritage and pretend to admire solely the
culture of the West. (Eastern singers were an exception -- first as wedding
performers and now as media stars. They became popular as "Mediterranean
singers".)
If Miri Regev were a cultured person, and not
merely a Minister of Culture, she would have devoted her considerable energy to
the revitalization of this culture and giving back pride to her community. But
this does not really interest her. And there is another reason.
This Mizrahi culture is totally bound up with
the Arab-Muslim culture. It cannot be mentioned without noticing the close
relationship between the two for many centuries, during which Muslims and Jews
worked together for the advancement of mankind, long before the world heard of
Shakespeare or Goethe.
I have always believed that restoring pride
was the duty of a new generation of peace-lovers that will arise from among the
Mizrahi society. Lately, men and women from this community have reached key
positions in the peace camp. I have high hopes.
They will have to fight the present culture
minister -- a minister who has nothing in common with culture, and a Mizrahi
woman who has no Mizrahi roots.
I HOPE for a Jewish-Mizrahi revival in this
country because it can advance Israeli-Arab peace and because it can strengthen
again the loosened ties between the different communities in our state.
As a non-religious person I prefer the
Mizrahi religiosity, which has always been moderate and tolerant, to the
fanatical Zionist-religious camp that is predominantly Ashkenazi. I have always
preferred Rabbi Ovadia Josef to the Rabbis Kook, father and son. I prefer Arie
Der'I to Naftali Bennett.
I detest Donald Trump and Trumpism. I dislike
Miri Regev and her culture.
Nenhum comentário:
Postar um comentário